Category: national studies-2

Secondly, there is a tradition of realism in the international analysis of historical sociology, such as the views of Weber, Skchpole, Titi, and Michelman, which are exactly the same as the realistic theory of international relations, and the result is the lack of cohesion between domestic and international research. national studies-History-Culture-Literature.national2-studies-history-culture-literature.

John M. Hobson, “What at stake in ‘bringing historical sociology back into international relations?”, in Stephen Hobden and John M. Hobson eds., Historical Sociology of International Relations, pp. 5-20.national studies-History-Culture-Literature.national2-studies-history-culture-literature.

Stephen Hobden, International Relations and Historical Sociology: Breaking down boundaries, pp. 66-69; Andrew Linklater, The Transformation of Political Community, University of South Carolina Press, 1998, pp. 18-22.Chris Brown, “International Political Theory—A British Social Science”(renew), in British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 2, No. 1, April 2000, p. 115; Immanuel Wallerstein, The Capitalist World-Economy, Cambridge University Press,1979; Immanuel Wallerstein, Unthinking Social Science, Philadelphia: Temple University Press,,2001; Andre Gunder Frank, ReOrient Global Economy in the Asian Age, London: University of California Press, 1998; John M Hobson, “Reconstructing International Relations Through World History: Oriental Globalization and the Global–Dialogic Conception of Inter-Civilizational Relations”, International Politics (2007) 44, pp. 414–430.Martin Shaw, Global Society, and International Relations: Social concepts and political perspectives, by Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers, 1994, p. 61.